Categories
1.5 UNIT 1 Written Components

1.5 Written Responses

The Methods of Contextualising written response was divided into two parts.

  1. Individually written statement on the project
  2. A set of 6 references developed as a group
Categories
1.5 UNIT 1

Methods of Contextualising II

Categories
1.5 UNIT 1

Methods of Contextualising I

For the fifth brief, me and members of my group (Rada, Shavonne) decided to work with a collection of stamps  issued by Finnish postal service in 2014 featuring illustrations from a Finnish homoerotic artist Tom of Finland.

To start the process, we begun exploring the stamps, researching on the V&A website and taking notes. We had an active discussion over our opinions and positions.

For my position, I was not surprised that the idea coming from one of the North European countries, as it is viewed by Czech as a developed, modern part of Europe. In my opinion, Czech could potentially  once see this as a possibility, but in the future, maybe a few years. I personaly think the timing of Finland’s project was a bit inconvenient  for the rest of the Europe, and that it came a bit “too soon”. I  think the time for such project would be now as my generation is the loudest and keen to fight for change and raise the topic on social media.

I wondered what the “affect/reaction” would be if such stamps were produced now? In 2023 when people openly talk and share topics of sexuality and gender.

Find the whole process below:

Categories
1.4 UNIT 1 Written Components

1.4 Written Response

Categories
1.4 UNIT 1

Methods of Iterating IV – Final Crit

This week I continued by:  Brainstorming, asking more questions, experimenting digitally and with Risograph to come up with an approach that challenges Riso.

Question development based on the last week’s feedback:

How to achieve an effect/ illusion of plasticity and depth in my Riso prints without using the 3D glasses?

And how to transform that into an approach that can be continued and developed?